Pain killers can be prescribed as long as there is no danger or intention of death. Consciousness of the patient is strongly encouraged, so that if dying, one may prepare to accept to meet God.
We cannot do whatever to our bodies, since they are not our own. God made us and knows what we need here on earth, so that we, someday, may enter into eternity. If Christ endured immense suffering, then why do we expect any less? We are called to be imitations of Christ and to share in His Passion.
Is my life really mine? Both in life and death we belong to the Lord. God, being the author of life, alone has the right to create and destroy life.
No human person has this right to take innocent human life, no matter how one tries to justify it. Thou shall not kill is still a command and not a suggestion, as many seem to believe. There are many reasons why Euthanasia is gravely immoral some of which have already been discussed.
Suffering has many benefits, especially suffering in the last days of one's life. In addition to sharing in Christ's Passion, one may find peace in God, reconciliation with family and friends and acceptance of death. There are many benefits and advantages to suffering. However in a pragmatic society as ours, we tend to look past the positives and see only the negative side. This type of reasoning has led many to see death as the answer suffering, regardless of the consequences.
Euthanasia whether active or passive is immoral and contrary to God's law Within passive euthanasia, what is considered extraordinary means of sustaining life may not always be clear, but ordinary means such as hydration and nutrition must be provided. We must look past the suffering in this world and look towards eternal home with God.
We must also ask ourselves concerning euthanasia; where will it end: Will the handicapped or mentally retarded be next? Will teenage who are the leading age group of suicide; also have this 'right to die'? The answer rests in our hands. If we continue to disrespect human life and its creator, God, then well destroy ourselves. A right is a moral claim and since we do not have a claim on death which itself has a claim on us, we cannot act for the right we don't have.
If we ever decide that a poor quality of life justifies ending that life have taken a step down a slippery slope that places all of us in danger. There difference between allowing nature to take its course and actively assisting The call for euthanasia surfaces in our society periodically, as it is doing now the guise of "death with dignity" or assisted suicide.
Sick bedridden people are already bereft of all rights; they feel a burden for their relatives. Humble and disabled, they want at least to leave this world peacefully and to die with dignity. Even criminals have a right for their last wish; frankly speaking, it is our duty to fulfill the last wish of sick patients. So, thus we incite them to a great sin and crime. Besides, a man is created for life, and all of us have the instinct of self-preservation, only people driven to despair by their disease, can ask for death and it is their right.
It is necessary to realize how horrible it is to live, being conscious of the forthcoming death. Most people cannot overcome this pressure and lose the sense of life, burdening their own life and the life of their relatives as well. In cases of inability of patients to express their will, euthanasia is also possible and is justified. Then the decision should be taken by the relatives, who are responsible for that.
Often it is obvious that the patient is doomed to death and has no chances to survive. Still, relatives have to provide all necessary medicines and to pay for places in hospital. Many families spend their last money on the treatment that is vain. Another possible reason for the justifying of euthanasia is the lack of space in hospitals for those who can be cured and saved.
It is bitter to acknowledge it, but this problem exists in many countries. Those who want to live have no chance to get the proper treatment and care while those who want to die cannot give their place to them. In fact, I suppose the greatest problem of this controversial point is the inability of the government to implement a thoroughly made law that can foresee all the possible problems of the legalization of euthanasia and avoid them.
To make a conclusion, I am sure that euthanasia has the right to exist in our society. It should be considered not as a murder but as an absolute necessity in urgent situations. Euthanasia and the Right to Die. Report of the Select Committee on Medical Ethics.
Session , HL Paper I. London, HMSO, 4. Euthanasia — a critique. N Engl J Med
The Case for Euthanasia - In order to provide a framework for my thesis statement on the morality of euthanasia, it is first necessary to define what euthanasia is and the different types of euthanasia.
Euthanasia is a serious political, moral and ethical issue in today's society. Most people either strictly forbid it or firmly favor euthanasia. Although, I.
Short Essay on “Euthanasia” – The term “euthanasia” is brought from the Greek word “euthanatize” meaning “well death”. In recent years, there has been crying debate round the globe over the issue, whether euthanasia is legalized. Before going ahead on this issue, it is desirable here to first be introduced with this terminology. This essay has been submitted by a law student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. Life or death Euthanasia .
Free sample essay on why euthanasia should be legalised. Get help with writing an essay on euthanasia topic. Pro euthanasia arguments essay example. Research paper on legalizing euthanasia. Passive euthanasia allows one to die by withholding or withdrawing life supporting means. This is a tricky area because ordinary and extraordinary means of supporting life come into the picture. words essay on Euthanasia- Mercy Killing.