Court battles have been filed and to some extent gays and lesbians have succeeded in obtaining some degree of social recognition Staver 5. The gay movement argument for same sex marriage is basically founded on the norm of formal equality.
They argue that the state needs to accord the gays the same legal options as other different sex couples enjoy. This includes the right and duties required in civil marriage. Economic benefits that the proponents of gay marriages cite include increased revenue as a result of additional marriages through marriage taxes Stockland For a long time the culture of men and women marrying each other in the society has been established globally.
Two men or women marrying therefore have resulted to a controversy where people have differing opinions. Same sex marriages cannot have children. The debate for this issue of same sex marriage has existed for many years and a gay right movement was established in America during the s. Getting married is a decision which is personal and private.
The controversy brought by gay marriages includes changing the norm of marriage and challenges in existing laws and religious traditions. Many religions in the world object to the issue of gay marriages on the grounds of morality. Churches base on their beliefs of what is wrong or right on scriptures which are holy writings. The church believes that allowing the gay couples to adopt children would be an injustice as the children will lack the proper moral upbringing.
Opponents of gay marriages cite the increased social costs such as healthcare thus affecting the economy. Those against this kind of marriage think that same sex couples should not be allowed to adopt children. The opponents are generally concerned about the harmful effect gay marriages would have on the society in case of legalization.
They believe that the family institution is protected through heterosexual marriage whose main aim is to procreate.
They further believe that marriage would no longer have the same meaning if homosexual couples find alternative methods of having children Nagle First, every person has a right to exercise and acquire freedom and equality as a basic law. The battle over same-sex marriage will be forever ongoing.
Same-sex marriage has been in history for decades. Design of the bill. Restate Main arguments as well as counterarguments. Legalizing same-sex marriage will create equality. In early times, same-sex marriage was not considered taboo and in many cultures, it was encouraged. Random History explains that in the early civilizations of Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt, the union between couples of the same-sex was recognized by the kingdom.
Same-sex marriages were often believed to be more pure than a heterosexual marriage. Marriage was believed to be the union of two people based on love. A marriage consisting of two males or two females, if women had the right to get married, was not frowned upon. It was not until the rise of Christianity that a negative attitude towards same-sex marriage became introduced.
The belief that marriage was based on procreation and any relationship that was non-procreative began to increase in many societies. Japanese Buddhism records the most tolerant attitude toward homosexuality, praising it for its mystery.
Today, there are no religious or political limitations on homosexual behavior in Japan. Sexuality is considered a private matter and lacks any restrictions.
Other things, such as mixed race relationships were considered more offensive than homosexuality. Random History also explains how in the thirteenth century, the first laws banning sodomy were introduced and were strictly enforced. Through the next centuries, homosexual behavior became deviant and was punished. Due to the belief that homosexual behavior was wrong, the belief that heterosexual relationships were normal became popular among the majority of countries.
By the nineteenth century, heterosexuality became the most believed standard for relationships. Although the debate for same-sex marriage became noticeably public in the late twentieth century, it was not until during a Hawaiian case, that the issue became national news.
The ruling of the case stated that the restriction of marriage and its benefits to opposite-sex couples were unconstitutional. By that same year, a majority of states passed laws prohibiting same-sex marriage. Since then, states have defined their own definition of marriage. Despite the fact that the debate over same-sex marriage is relatively new in the United States, five states have made same-sex marriage legal, as well as Washington D.
In California, the marriage is only recognized if it was before proposition 8. Ballot Pedias research explains how proposition 8 is a statewide ballot proposition in California. The people of California voted for the illegalization of same-sex marriage. Though some people are against same-sex marriages for religious reasons, not allowing same-sex marriages is discrimination.
Same-sex marriages should be legalized because the discrimination same-sex couples receive is emotionally traumatic, and unfair. The most influential reason against same-sex marriage is based on religion. Many people believe that procreation is the ideal reason for marriage. Their belief is that same-sex couples do not have the capability to produce children which is the basis for marriage. However, when two of the most influential religious icons discussed marriage, child bearing was not a reason for two people to get married.
Both men stressed how the quality of a relationship was the most important aspect for marriage. If marriage is reserved for having a child, then same-sex marriages are not an issue.
Legalizing same sex marriage would allow each couple to be on the same health plan as well as claim rights to belongings and inheritance. If married heterosexual couples have these rights, so should homosexual couples Brumbaugh, In opposition, it is argued that allowing same sex marriages would change the nature of parenthood. Marriage is seen not only as a commitment of two people, but also as a form of procreation. It is a known fact that in order to procreate, both a man and woman are needed.
It is disputed that by allowing same sex couples to marry would also allow Judith Drake's essay was first published anonymo Intercultural Marriage " Argumentative Ess This argumentative essay on Gay Marriage will Argumentative Essay On Li Argumentative Essay , Argumentative Essay.
Legalizing same-sex marriage will create equality. Lauren Altergott. Ms. Woolley. The Injustice Involving Same-sex Marriage. In early times, same-sex marriage was not .
For my research paper, I challenged myself to write it about why same-sex marriage should not be legalized. After three days of research, I regret to inform you that, with the information I found, there is no logical reason whatsoever that same-sex couples should not be able to get married/5(2).
Points Research 3 Task B: The Annotated Bibliography 4 Putting the Pieces Together 11 The Overview 11 The Facts 11 The Final Conclusion 12 The Same-Sex Marriage Introduction and Background A marriage amongst two individuals of the same sex individuality and/or same genetic sex is known as gay marriage or same-sex marriage. The most fundamental issue when addressing same-sex marriage is the definition of marriage itself. A universally accepted definition has yet to be established because marriage is a delicate entanglement of personal intimacy and public declaration.4/5(12).
May 21, · Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage Thesis. The question regarding legalization of same-sex marriages relates to fundamental change of law not just nationally, but also internationally. Legalizing gay marriages is an important step towards the enforcement of the constitutional guarantee of equality of all before the law and equal protection of the law. marriage and in supporting the movement for same-sex marriage, but the institution of marriage would have undergone these changes regardless of any push for the acceptance of same-sex marriage. This paper will contend that acceptance of same-sex marriage will require changes in public attitudes.